The Realignment: Scenes from The Realignment Live in DC
Subscribe to our Supercast to support the show
Welcome Back to The Realignment
Thanks for checking out The Realignment’s Substack newsletter.
If you’re new, hit subscribe to get future issues in your inbox every *Friday*.
Hey everyone, I’m finally back in Austin from our Realignment Live event on Wednesday. The event couldn’t have gone better. We’re going to start publishing the conversations this upcoming week.
Speaking of next week, let me know if you’re going to be in Austin for our Breaking Points live show on Friday night.
Scenes from The Realignment Live
Politico’s Derek Robertson (and previous Realignment guest) attended our event and featured it in his newsletter. Here is the excerpt:
For eight full hours yesterday in Washington, at the trendy, all-exposed-brick Union Market event space AutoShop, the intellectual vanguard of the right gathered to hash out the future of American conservatism — and how its institutions might harness the disruptive forces that are shaping it, both technological and otherwise.
The center-right Lincoln Network, which hosted the event — an all-day live version of its “Realignment” podcast — is one of the Washington policy outfits most laser-focused on the intersection of future tech and political ideology. The idea was to hash out how the tech-minded “New Right” might keep its own project of “disruption” going as the fervor of the Trump era cools off ever so slightly.
The conservative wonks and thinkers who gathered in D.C.’s northeast yesterday are deeply interested in building the future in both a literal and philosophical sense. (See also: an essay published in the most recent issue of The New Atlantis, titled “Can There Be a Conservative Futurism?”) So it was particularly notable who attended from outside the right-wing tent — namely the anti-monopoly maven Matt Stoller, who joined former Trump administration official and editor-in-chief of the policy journal American Affairs Julius Krein onstage.
Is there really common ground here? Stoller and Krein opined together on the future of the event’s titular “Realignment,” specifically the bipartisan shift toward both antitrust and domestic-minded tech and manufacturing policy represented respectively by Lina Khan’s FTC chairship and the CHIPS and Science Act.
They both want to usher in an era of resurgent American industry, but their feelings about tech and business could be as conflicted as their party politics — not to mention what, to them, is a stubbornly persistent status quo in Washington.
“When you get a Lina Khan at the FTC it’s great, and she’s doing a lot of the things conservatives demanded the FTC do,” Stoller said. “But then the Wall Street Journal will just write 15 articles about how Lina Khan is a woke Marxist. And then all of a sudden in Congress all the Republicans are like, ‘She's a woke Marxist!’”
“I think that the ‘Realignment’ agenda does work,” said Krein, “And I think you can see that with J.D. Vance’s win… But I would agree that at this point right-wing populism is not particularly credible because it's a lot more sort of MAGA noises than anything.”
While think-tank rock stars like Stoller and Krein spoke with candor about the realpolitik necessary to reshape government’s approach to tech, one speaker from the tech world argued that conservative philosophy is actually embedded in certain technologies, or at least the blockchain.
Danny O’Brien, senior fellow for the blockchain-storage-focused Filecoin Foundation, made a case to the assembled audience that’s usually made in much more vociferous terms by maximalist libertarian Bitcoin boosters — that blockchain is a fundamentally conservativetechnology in how it protects individual rights from venal and vulnerable centralized organizations.
It also became clear that not everyone is on board with the version of tech governance that people like Krein and some of the Lincolneers have in mind. The conservative world is ideologically diverse on tech and nearly everything else. Will Rinehart, a tech researcher at Utah State University’s Center for Growth and Opportunity, outlined his critiques in a Twitter thread about the conference (along with, to be sure, some compliments).
When I spoke with Will he critiqued in particular Stoller’s explanation of the political reality around Khan’s FTC chairship, saying, as he also tweeted, that the process of her nomination itself was to blame. It might seem like small potatoes, but it’s a neat reminder of what stands in the way of the sweeping changes and innovations planned by many of the convention’s attendees: The bureaucratic vagaries, machinations, and plain old grudges that still make things go in Washington.
Also, here’s the link to the Center for Growth and Opportunity’s Will Rinehart’s Twitter thread on the event:
Supercast and Next Week’s Exclusive Q&A Episode
We’ll be back with another exclusive ask-me-anything episode next week. You can access the feed/podcast episodes by subscribing to our Supercast. Subscribe below:
Here are some of the questions we plan on answering next week:
Lingering Question from Realignment Live
Yuval Levin had a great response to the question of "What time is it in regards to the current moment in politics?" 'It is always time to invest in the production of citizens.' Kristen Soltis Anderson later cites that the population gap between young conservatives and young liberals is larger today than previous generations. The event was filled with great ideas and recommendations for conservatives to move toward but only Chris Griswold had a bone to pick with current ideologies that were having a negative impact on American conservatism, namely market fundamentalism. My question is what other current conservative ideologies do you think are having a negative impact on America's ability to incentivize investment in the younger generation?
Moment of Zen Follow Up (DC Insider Takes)
Really appreciated your appearance on Moment of Zen, especially the moment describing Southern, State-School RNC types. I'm DC-based and felt seen by the discussion of how DC insider baseball actually works. I also really enjoyed the description that most DC events are "head pats" for the wealthy. Would love more on this. Can you both describe the various "lanes" in DC insider baseball, the incentives that drive the lane, the stereotypes, etc. Could include categories like hill staffers, life long hill staffers, political consultants, RNC types, the journalist pecking order, any you guys can think of. Even within the DC bubble you guys have enough time in city but have maintained distance to have good perspective!
The Consensus
Hi Marshall, I recall you bringing up how there is no real consensus for what is next, and that is why we cant go forward. I am curious how you feel about that in 2023?
This Week’s Free Episodes
335 | America's Pacific Power Paradox and the Roots of Asia's Instability with Van Jackson
334 | Is Main Street Conservatism the Future of the Right? with Helen Andrews & Emile Doak
333 | Inside the New House China Select Committee with Rep. Mike Gallagher
The Realignment Bookshop
We’ve created a Realignment Bookshop affiliate store showcasing books by guests, what we’re actively reading this year, and deeper dives into the featured topic of an episode.
If you purchase a book using our link, the show gets a 10% commission, a local, independent bookseller gets support, and you get an awesome book!
What We’re Reading: 2023 Edition
If you’ve made it this far, you really should subscribe to support our show : )
https://realignment.supercast.com/
Let us know what you think about this or any other week’s episodes. Please share The Realignment with anyone who’d enjoy the podcast.
As a neoliberal globalist, I was interested to hear what the “Main Street conservatives” had to say and I came away not worried at all.
I know it’s not Marshall’s style to push back too hard but those two need to be mocked for their “ideas “ which can be generously described as half baked, late night Hillsdale dorm banter.
We should pause immigration until chant immigrants have integrated “enough”? They want America to be like a country song as an ideal? “You know how when you travel and you can just tell someone’s an American…yeah…”
If these dopes are the vanguard of social conservatism, I’m not worried.