Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Clara B Jones's avatar

pps ... i am arguing that non-elite white men benefit more in Status & Power from identifying as & voting Republican than they do as Democrats ...

... i guess, thus, i am arguing that the migration of non-elite white men, increasingly, is more explained by Endogenous [Psychological] than Exogenous [e.g., Anti-African-American] factors ... maybe the previous statement applies, as well, to Hispanic, Black, & Asian men, also ...

... i think it remains to be determined quantitatively the extent to which White Supremacy is a Main Effect and to what extent other factors [especially, Economics, Status, Power] explain the effects of WS ...

Expand full comment
Clara B Jones's avatar

p.s. ... this morning i was thinking about frequent claims that the non-elite members of Trump's base are acting against their own interests-- particularly, their Economic interests... i was also thinking about the common assertions that members of T's non-elite base are "stupid" or duped... i thought about the distinction made in the Social Sciences between Status [how others perceive you] and Power [access to resources]-- T's non-elites, historically, have Status, ab initio (& formerly, de jure) because they are white and because of "heritage" factors [e.g., their sons are responsible for going to war and for winning them-- including, the Revolutionary War; they, historically, built America (MAGA)]; most members of T's non-elite & elite base are white, so it is in the interest of both groups to become allies-- to preserve their Status... the sons of the non-elite who have won our wars gain a lot of Status from Trump's elite supporters [but, probably, not from many minorities, especially, African-Americans]... thus, i would say that it is logical, rational, even, obvious for Trump's non-elite followers to align with him his elite followers, and, by extension, the Republican Party... Trump's elite followers, obviously, face the imminent loss of a [slow?] erosion of their Power... T elites & T non-elites are "natural" bedfellows...

... the same logic might apply to T's elite & non-elite minority followers [increasingly, Hispanics, African-American men, Asians] if their Status &/or Power is threatened [mostly, Status, i would guess-- maybe these groups have negligible Power?]...

... i would propose that the only Status AfAmericans have is via association with & support from Liberal Whites with whom they have had a co-dependent, paternalistic relationship with since Slavery... probably Bi-racial & light-skinned AfAmericans have enhanced Status-- at least in some spaces [see Stuart Hall UK on differential rules as a function of different social spaces]...

... the Status-Power analysis can, also, be applied to women whose Status, in great part, comes from their historically co-dependent, paternalistic, relationship to men... probably, on balance, women have little Power...

... pretty much all of these ideas can be estimated & modeled quantitatively to explore & forecast possible causes, correlates, functions, & outcomes... [in addition, note Exchange Theory, Optimality Theory, Game Theory, "arms race" literature in Ecology & Military Science]...

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts